Nintendo @ E3: Not that good... from IGN to G4.

[BoneStormer]

Well if you think Bloodless Roar controls fine, then you probablly won't have too many gripes with SC2 on GC. It's not that it's so bad on GC, just in a genre that is so depandant on good control, it's lacking that tight, precise feel. Plus, based on other fighters, PS2 and Xbox will both probably control better. So unless things change, that's where I will be playing SC2.

Get out, and take your Sacagawea dollars with you! I'll give you 'til three. One!

[nbrid]

What exactly is going to change? That is pretty much an assurance that you wont be getting the GC version. I was playing SC with the dreamcast stick last night and sometimes it doesn't do the things i want it to do. This is partially because the joystick is much bigger than a regular d-pad and the green ball on top can be screwed circlewise (I couldnt think of a better word to describe it). Anyways, I dont see the big problem with control in the SC2 demo. Once you discern which buttons do what, you can play fine. I also think that a lot of people will be using the analog stick to play this game. It's similar to using a joystick...only not. Personally, Ill stay away from it, but for a 3d fighter like SC, most people shouldnt have a problem with it.

Why DO they call it bloody roar? I think a more appropriate term would be sparkly roar or furry fisticuffs.